The father of the late nurse, Mary Habila, has said the family does not wish to authorize an autopsy, maintaining that they have accepted her death as an act of God and are prepared to proceed with burial arrangements.
Speaking amid growing public interest in the circumstances surrounding his daughter’s death, the bereaved father explained that the family had no intention of requesting a post-mortem examination. According to him, death is an inevitable part of life and can occur unexpectedly, regardless of age or circumstance.
“We don’t want an autopsy. Death can occur at any time,” he said, urging the public to respect the family’s decision during their period of mourning.
His remarks come as the death of Mary Habila has generated widespread attention, with calls from some members of the public for further investigation into the circumstances surrounding her passing. However, the family insists it prefers to focus on mourning their daughter rather than prolonging the process through additional medical examinations.
The father’s statement has sparked mixed reactions. While some sympathized with the family’s position and argued that relatives have the right to determine how they wish to handle the remains of their loved one, others maintained that an autopsy could help establish the exact cause of death, particularly if there are unresolved questions surrounding the incident.
Legal and medical experts note that, in most cases, families may decline an autopsy unless one is required by law or ordered by the appropriate authorities as part of a criminal or coroner’s investigation. Such decisions generally depend on the circumstances of the death and the applicable legal procedures.
At the time of filing this report, security agencies and relevant health authorities had not announced any change in the handling of the case. No official statement had been issued indicating that an autopsy would be mandated.
As tributes continue to pour in for the late nurse, the family has appealed for privacy and understanding as they grieve. The case has also reignited discussions about death investigations, family rights, and the balance between public interest and respect for the wishes of bereaved relatives.
