A political commentator, Great Imo Jonathan, has argued that if former Borno State Governor Ali Modu Sheriff is opposed to Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi, it reinforces the case for Obi as a credible leader for Nigeria.
In an opinion article titled, “If Alleged Boko Haram Sponsor Ali Modu Sheriff Is Opposed to Peter Obi, That Makes Him the Right Man for Nigeria,” Jonathan contends that Nigerians should judge political leaders not only by their competence, character and vision but also by the interests they threaten.
The writer alleges that extremist groups thrive in poverty, ignorance and instability, and argues that policies focused on education, economic productivity, healthcare and accountable governance undermine the conditions in which violent extremism flourishes.
Jonathan claims that Obi’s recurring message of moving Nigeria “from consumption to production,” investing in human capital, strengthening institutions and promoting fiscal discipline stands in direct contrast to the objectives of those who profit from insecurity.
The article further argues that leaders committed to the rule of law, transparency and national unity naturally become unattractive to individuals or groups allegedly linked to violent extremism.
Throughout the piece, the author repeatedly refers to Ali Modu Sheriff as an “alleged” sponsor of Boko Haram, asserting that allegations against the former governor have shaped public perceptions of his political interventions. Sheriff has consistently denied links to the insurgent group and has not been convicted by a court of law for sponsoring Boko Haram.
According to Jonathan, Nigerians should consider who benefits from the country’s continued insecurity and economic challenges when assessing presidential hopefuls. He argues that policies aimed at expanding education, creating jobs, strengthening security and diversifying the economy would reduce the space for extremist groups to operate.
The opinion concludes that while competence and track record remain the primary criteria for choosing a president, opposition from individuals the author associates with violent extremism should prompt Nigerians to examine whose interests are threatened by a candidate’s proposed reforms.
Jonathan ultimately maintains that if Obi’s vision of national unity, economic transformation and institutional reform places him at odds with those accused of benefiting from instability, it may indicate that his agenda aligns with Nigeria’s long-term interests.
