Social media influencer known as Justice Crack has been remanded in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) following his arraignment at the Federal High Court in Abuja over allegations linked to a viral video about soldiers’ food conditions.
The 28-year-old was arraigned on May 4 on a three-count charge brought under provisions of Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act and the Criminal Code. Prosecutors allege that he published false information concerning the quality of meals provided to members of the Nigerian military and created content capable of inciting public unrest.
According to court documents, the case stems from a video shared on social media in which the influencer allegedly criticised food supplies within military barracks. Authorities claim the content was misleading and had the potential to undermine morale within the armed forces.
Security sources also allege that his arrest on May 2 followed investigations that included private online communications with some soldiers. He was subsequently taken into custody by the Nigerian Army before being transferred for formal prosecution.
At his court appearance, the Federal High Court ordered that Justice Crack be remanded in DSS custody until May 25, pending further hearing of the case.
The case has sparked reactions both online and at the court premises, where a group of supporters gathered chanting “Free Justice Crack,” calling for his release and questioning the charges against him.
Military authorities, however, have warned against the spread of content they describe as capable of inciting disaffection or undermining ongoing security operations, particularly in regions affected by insurgency and armed conflict.
They maintain that misinformation about the welfare of troops could negatively affect morale and public perception of the armed forces at a time when national security challenges remain a priority.
Legal observers note that the case highlights growing tensions between digital content creators and regulatory authorities over the limits of free expression, particularly in relation to national security issues.
As proceedings continue, the court is expected to further review the evidence when the matter returns on May 25, while public debate over the case continues to intensify across social media platforms.
