Former Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Sam Amadi, has criticized the decision by Minister of Works, David Umahi, to publicly comment on the death of nurse Mary Habila, arguing that such remarks could undermine public confidence in the ongoing process surrounding the case.
Speaking during a public engagement, Amadi said public office holders should exercise caution when addressing sensitive matters that have attracted widespread public attention. According to him, statements from senior government officials on unresolved cases risk creating perceptions of bias or influencing public opinion before the relevant authorities conclude their work.
Amadi maintained that investigations into matters involving loss of life should be left to the appropriate agencies, stressing that transparency, due process, and professionalism are essential to preserving public trust.
“In situations like this, it would have been more appropriate to allow the relevant authorities to complete their investigations before making public pronouncements,” he said.
The comments follow public discussions generated by Umahi’s earlier remarks concerning the circumstances surrounding Mary Habila’s death. The case has attracted significant attention on social media and among civil society groups, with many calling for a transparent and impartial investigation.
Amadi emphasized that government officials should avoid making statements that could be interpreted as prejudging an ongoing matter. He noted that maintaining institutional neutrality is important in ensuring that investigations are seen as credible and free from external influence.
His remarks have sparked varied reactions. While some commentators agreed that public officials should refrain from commenting on unresolved cases, others argued that government representatives have a responsibility to respond to issues that generate widespread public concern.
Legal analysts have similarly observed that caution is often necessary when discussing ongoing investigations, as public statements may inadvertently affect public perception or create unnecessary controversy. They stress that official findings should come from the agencies responsible for conducting investigations.
As public interest in the Mary Habila case continues, attention remains focused on the relevant authorities handling the matter. Observers say the outcome of the investigation, together with clear and timely communication from the appropriate institutions, will be crucial in addressing public concerns and reinforcing confidence in the investigative process.
