Fresh controversy has erupted within Nigeria’s opposition landscape following remarks attributed to Femi Gbajabiamila, who allegedly advised a federal lawmaker to remain within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and disrupt internal party dynamics rather than defecting to the ruling party.
The comments, reportedly directed at ADC lawmaker Leke Abejide during a political gathering over the weekend, have triggered widespread reactions across political circles and social media, further intensifying an already deepening leadership crisis within the opposition party.
According to sources familiar with the interaction, Gbajabiamila urged Abejide to “stay back, fight, and retain control” within the ADC instead of joining the All Progressives Congress (APC). The advice comes at a time when the ADC is grappling with internal divisions, including a contentious leadership dispute that has spilled into the courts.
At the heart of the crisis is a faction led by David Mark, which recently announced the expulsion of Abejide and another member, Nafiu Bala. Both individuals have rejected the decision, describing it as illegitimate, and have since challenged the move in court while also petitioning the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for intervention.
Gbajabiamila’s alleged involvement has, however, drawn sharp criticism from observers who view the remarks as inappropriate interference in the internal affairs of an opposition party. Critics argue that such statements, if accurately reported, could undermine democratic norms and raise concerns about the independence of political institutions in Nigeria.
Social media platforms have been flooded with reactions, with many users accusing the ruling APC of attempting to weaken opposition parties ahead of the 2027 general elections. Some commentators described the reported advice as a calculated strategy aimed at fostering division within the ADC, thereby reducing its effectiveness as a political challenger.
“This is not just about one party; it’s about the health of our democracy,” one analyst noted. “When those in power are perceived to be influencing opposition dynamics, it creates distrust and deepens political polarization.”
However, not all reactions have been critical. A segment of political observers interprets Gbajabiamila’s remarks as a reflection of strategic political thinking rather than direct interference. According to this perspective, advising a politician to consolidate power within their existing platform could be seen as pragmatic, particularly in a political environment where defections are frequent.
Despite these differing views, the episode underscores the fragile state of opposition politics in Nigeria. The ADC, which has recently attracted prominent political figures and increased grassroots interest, is now facing a crucial test of unity and internal governance.
As legal proceedings continue and INEC weighs its position, the outcome of the dispute could have significant implications for the party’s credibility and its prospects in the 2027 elections. Analysts warn that prolonged infighting may erode public confidence and weaken the party’s ability to present a viable alternative to the ruling APC.
For now, the ADC remains at a crossroads, caught between internal struggles and external scrutiny. Whether it can navigate this turbulent period and emerge stronger may well determine its role in shaping Nigeria’s political future.
