The Kebbi State chapter of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has described the prosecution of former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), as politically motivated, alleging that the legal action is aimed at weakening opposition figures ahead of the 2027 general elections.
In a statement issued by the party, the ADC expressed concern over the timing of the case, arguing that the prosecution has generated questions about whether anti-corruption institutions are being applied impartially or influenced by political considerations.
According to the party, while the fight against corruption remains essential to national development, investigations and prosecutions should be conducted fairly, transparently and without regard to political affiliation. The ADC maintained that the credibility of Nigeria’s anti-corruption campaign depends on ensuring that all suspects receive equal treatment under the law.
The party further stated that no individual should be presumed guilty before the conclusion of judicial proceedings, stressing that every accused person is entitled to the constitutional presumption of innocence and the right to a fair hearing before a competent court.
The comments follow recent legal actions involving Malami, including court proceedings related to the forfeiture of several properties linked to the former minister as part of ongoing investigations by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). The anti-graft agency has maintained that its actions are based on evidence obtained during investigations into alleged money laundering and related financial offences.
The EFCC has consistently stated that its operations are guided by the law and that it investigates all cases based on available evidence rather than political considerations. The commission has also reiterated its commitment to prosecuting corruption cases without fear or favour.
Political observers say the ADC’s position reflects growing concerns among opposition parties over the neutrality of state institutions as political activities ahead of the 2027 elections gather momentum. They note that allegations of politically motivated prosecutions have featured prominently in Nigeria’s political discourse across successive administrations.
However, governance experts caution that such claims should be supported by credible evidence, emphasising that courts remain the appropriate forum for determining the merits of criminal allegations. They argue that ongoing judicial proceedings should be allowed to continue without external interference or political pressure.
Civil society organisations have similarly urged all parties to respect the judicial process while calling on anti-corruption agencies to maintain transparency, professionalism and independence in handling high-profile cases involving public officials.
Legal analysts also stress that the prosecution of former government officials, where supported by sufficient evidence, forms an important part of accountability and the rule of law. At the same time, they emphasise that due process and judicial independence are essential safeguards against the misuse of prosecutorial powers.
As the legal proceedings continue, the debate surrounding Malami’s prosecution is expected to remain a significant political issue. While the ADC insists the case is politically driven, the outcome will ultimately depend on the evidence presented before the courts and the decisions reached through Nigeria’s judicial process.
The development underscores the continuing intersection of law, politics and anti-corruption efforts in Nigeria, with observers calling for fairness, transparency and strict adherence to constitutional principles throughout the proceedings.
